The act of racing one greyhound against another is not necessarily hazardous for the dogs. View racing at Odense (Denmark) and rarely will you see an incident resulting in serious injury but Odense is one of the few tracks where greyhounds run on a straight course (over a 260 metre distance, writes Clive Ellis of Greyhound Watch.

In Britain, however, as in Ireland (and a number of other countries where greyhound racing is held) the dogs run on an oval-like circuit that essentially comprises two straights leading into tight bends. This configuration can prove lethal for the greyhounds with the risk of injury rising significantly when dogs are pitted against each other.

At the time of writing there are 25 tracks regulated under the Greyhound Board of Great Britain (GBGB) and 12 independent venues across England, Scotland and Wales.

Whilst all of the above are oval-like in configuration, variations exist from track to track in length of straights, banking and tightness of bends. There exists also huge disparity in the depth of sand (used for the surface and middle layers) and composition of base layer that in turn can affect the performance of a track.

Such variations impact on safety as does the maintenance of the track, operation of the mechanical hare, trap draw, grade, race distance and weather conditions. Research to date, however, would indicate that even where all factors relating to safety are judged ideal the frequency of injuries will never fall dramatically whilst dogs are competing on oval-like circuits.

Track ‘improvements’

In May 2008 the track at Owlerton (Sheffield) received both a new surface and drainage system costing in the region £125,000. General Manager Dave Perry was reported saying: “It is all about the welfare of our greyhounds here at Owlerton. The resurfacing of the track will improve our already high standards.”

Owlerton was a track that Perry apparently considered “one of the safest in the country” prior to the work carried out and with no change in its configuration was there ever likely to be a notable reduction in dogs injured?

On Greyhoundscene – the largest internet forum for UK members of the racing fraternity – the following posting was made in July 2008: “What’s going on at Sheffield – injury rates (have) nearly trebled since the track re-laid the surface at massive cost. All sorts of injuries being reported by all trainers – shoulders, wrists, gracilis, hocks… there'll be no sound dogs left at this rate!”

Similarly, two months following ‘improvements’ at Yarmouth Stadium in June 2010 to include a new surface and drainage and costing £190,000, owners were reporting a notable increase in the frequency of injuries – many serious – in both trials and races.

Anomalies in injury rates are inevitable and looking long term I would not expect such rates at either Sheffield or Yarmouth to be higher. By the same token I would be very surprised if either were to fall significantly.

Yarmouth Racing Manager Bill Johnson, speaking in August, believed the level of injuries had changed little since the work carried out. Perry said the injury rate at Sheffield had fallen but refused to say by how much as he felt the information could be used by those who appose racing.

Of course it’s good PR to claim 6 figure sums are being spent in the name of welfare, and I have no doubt that welfare is a factor (injuries to greyhounds are costly for both the owner and the business of racing) but if changes to the track have at best only a marginal impact on safety what other motive could there be for the money invested?

A clue can be found on another internet posting, again concerning the work at Sheffield: “Hopefully (it will) make the conditions fairer and remove the bias when the rain comes.”

Both the promoters and GBGB are seeking to protect and strengthen the integrity of racing. A good track surface, properly maintained, is a prerequisite for a consistent racing environment. This in turn gives the betting public the assurance that race outcomes are based solely on the dog’s ability.

It is further hoped that money being invested in ‘welfare’ will reduce the number of meetings cancelled due to bad weather that again can be very costly for the business of racing.

Injuries, Perry Barr

In a thesis published 1992 and titled The Nature and Incidence of Greyhound Racing Injuries, Agnew BP examined a record of injuries across 953 race meetings at Perry Barr (Birmingham). 

Perry Barr was converted from a grass/sand track to a modern all sand facility in 1978 and data was examined from both before and after the change in the running surface was made. It is data relating to the modern facility that of course carries particular weight and the statistics make for interesting reading.

1612 injuries were recorded across 748 meetings. This was broken down as follows: shoulder, 205; carpus, 475; metacarpus, 24; forefoot, 127; hindmuscle, 227; hock, 58; metatarsus, 5; hindfoot, 144; cramp, 234; combination, 54; miscellaneous, 59.

Career ending injuries are commonly hock related and out of the 58 listed above 2 greyhounds were recorded retired and 21 were recorded destroyed. This data, however, is based solely on the immediate post race decision.

Particularly notable is the injury rate as a percentage of runners rose from 4.6 for the year prior to conversion to an all sand facility to 6.6 for the year following conversion. The percentage rate for the all sand facility does later fall (3.9 being the lowest figure) but the difference is not as great as might be expected for the change made in the track surface.

Notable also is the figures for single limb injuries as a percentage of total injuries recorded that rose from 65.2 for the grass/sand track to 81.2 for the all sand facility.

The survey at Perry Barr is one of a number of similar studies both in Britain and abroad across which there exists a lack of uniformity in the recording of information and findings. Where consistency, however, does exist is in the analysis of data and the evident correlation between numerous injuries and track configuration.

Agnew concluded that the principal causal factor for injury patterns was the “definite and set task demanded of these athletes; the racing at speed on tight anti-clockwise tracks.”

Cornering

Sprinting into a bend increases effective body weight and a human will respond to this by extending the duration of contact each foot has with the ground. As a result, forces on the legs are said to remain constant.

A study, however, by Usherwood JR and Wilson AM and featured in Nature (Vol. 438), found that in greyhounds observed there was no notable change in foot contact timings when the dogs entered a tight bend. As such, forces on the limbs were calculated to increase by approximately 65%.

The use of banking will reduce horizontal loads and this in turn may see a reduction in injury rates. It has been calculated, however, that the degree of banking required to negate such forces would be so high as to generate additional hazards for the greyhounds as well proving almost impossible to maintain.

Indeed modern thinking with regard turn one is to keep the banking to a minimum so allowing the outside dogs to remain wide with the optimum level more a judgement than a science and not easy to ascertain.

At best the bends on a track can be made safer but not safe and injuries are inevitable with the site of injury frequently dictated by the direction of turn. World renowned veterinarian Alessandro Piras gives a figure of 96% for the incidence of central tarsal bone fractures occurring in the right leg.

Bergh MS, in a thesis examining this phenomenon, noted: “These fractures have been classified into five types; all of which usually contain a dorsal slab component. The cause of these fractures has not been rigorously investigated, but it is suspected that racing in a counter-clockwise direction on oval tracks produces cyclic overload of the medial compartment of the right tarsus.”

Dee JF and Dee LG further link track configuration with injury patterns: “The fact that the race is run on a circular track, in a counter-clockwise direction, exacerbates the stresses of racing. These increased stresses are substantiated by the locations of metacarpal/metatarsal injuries: they occur most frequently on the ‘rail’ side of the affected foot, specifically metacarpal V of the left foot, metacarpal II of the right foot and metatarsal III of the right foot.”

Dog interaction

Whilst many of the injuries greyhounds sustain are linked directly with the forces generated through cornering, many of the more serious that include long bone fractures are the result of a fall and/or collision with other dogs.

The potential to lose footing when negotiating the tight bends of a track at speeds of up to 40 mph is high for a greyhound running solo. Pitch six greyhounds against each other and there are an alarming number of incidents in which greyhounds collide and fall.

A survey by Greyhound Watch covering all tracks governed by the GBGB identified turn one as the point on the track where the greatest number of incidents occurs. In January 2010 alone, 109 dogs were recorded falling/brought down in turn one against dogs not finishing/finishing at distance, with the true figure likely much higher.

The above including 4 greyhounds that fell in the opening race at Mildenhall on 15 January, 3 falling in the penultimate race at Nottingham on 05 January and 3 falling in the second race of the evening meeting at Newcastle on 23 January.

As the dogs hurtle into turn one they are reaching a higher speed and are more tightly bunched than at any other point in the race. The result can be mayhem. Further compounding the situation can be wide runners allotted an inside trap (and vice versa) and pups running with seasoned dogs.

With the pressure to fill race cards it is inevitable that on occasion greyhounds are not ideally placed as Andrew Johnston posting on Greyhound Knowledge Forum is only too aware: “I had a pup run at Newcastle… it was bowled over 3 times out of 8 races at the first bend, a totally green pup thrown in with seasoned adult racers, the poor pup got so smashed up the third time it had to be put-to-sleep.”

The track bends create also a hazard for the greyhounds on the straights as all 4 turns (that make up one full circuit) influence the conflicting lines greyhounds will run on the straights. This again can result in dogs colliding, with potentially devastating consequences.  

Injuries, scale

It is impossible to give an exact annual total for injuries sustained and greyhound’s euthanased as a result of injury. Such information is being collated by the GBGB but is not being made public (against a key recommendation within a Parliamentary Group report published May 2007).

Though it has to be said the industry themselves do not have precise figures. Data compiled is based on track veterinary reports and many injuries are diagnosed only the following day (for the same reason above data recorded for Perry Barr is not complete). It has further been claimed that certain trainers who, at the time of a meeting, suspect a dog to be lame are not always having the animal checked by the vet in attendance.

What information is available, however, gives animal welfare charities and the like a good indication of scale.

Before Walthamstow closed I spoke with the racing office who stated that about 25 greyhounds were put down as a result of injury at the track over a 12 month period. Yarmouth office has given a similar figure. The number of races held at Walthamstow across one full year represented 4.7% of the total for GBGB tracks alone (figure based on the last full year of racing). The same calculation for Yarmouth in 2009 is a disturbing 3.1%.

In August this year the Swindon Advertiser reported the deaths of 4 greyhounds in as many weeks at the local track, all the result of incidents described as “in-running collisions,” and during a particularly awful spate of injuries covering a 4 week period last year at Belle Vue (Manchester), 6 greyhounds had to be destroyed.

At a single meeting on 15 January at Sittingbourne, steward’s recorded 11 greyhounds lame and one greyhound having ‘brokedown’. A further 2 finished at distance after falling. The total for greyhounds recorded lame/brokedown across January-March 2010 at the above track is 75.

It should, however, be noted that steward’s comments only hint at the scale of injuries. Perhaps a better indication of scale is the fact that at any one time a professional trainer will likely have as many as half his/her greyhounds out through injury.

From a wealth of information such as above it is very evident that the number of injuries sustained annually on British tracks is a 5 figure sum, many of which are serious and result in hundreds of greyhounds losing their lives. 

Conclusion

The GBGB state that a quarter of a million pounds was spent in 2008 “improving the safety of tracks across the country, reducing injuries and helping to extend racing careers.” The GBGB, however, have yet publish any evidence that injury rates long-term at any track have fallen dramatically.

And with tracks that are seeing a spate of fatalities, apparently, already among the safest in the country such evidence is never likely to materialise.

The Swindon racing office, in response to the recent deaths detailed above, is reported saying: “No expense is spared ensuring that we have the finest sand and fixtures on the track, plus the best track preparation, veterinary and racing teams in the business.”

The “finest” didn’t save Rackethall Kenny, Swift Abel, Wots Er Name and Daytwo, nor will the “finest” prevent thousands of greyhounds getting ‘smashed-up’ across the country every year.

Greyhound racing is frequently and wrongly compared with horse racing. The key difference is of course the horses are being controlled. A greyhound runs by instinctive reaction and when the mechanical hare veers sharp left the greyhound veers sharp left regardless of speed. Pitch 6 greyhounds against each other on an oval circuit and it’s a recipe for disaster.

And perhaps there lies the attraction for members of the racing fraternity. Will a greyhound get round in one piece and make the winning podium or will it be the greyhound’s last race?

I speak with trainers on a regular basis and I have no doubt all are passionate about greyhound racing. I have yet, however, to speak with a single trainer who is passionate about greyhounds. For that reason I do not expect the industry to ever change, fundamentally, the nature of greyhound racing in Britain.

Clive Ellis

Greyhound Watch

Station House

Holderness Road

Hull

HU9 3DW

07923 501830

The Canine Cook, Peter Speed will be cooking up a storm at the Lincolnshire Showground this weekend (21-22 August) as his business takes its completely natural range of dry dog food on the road for the very first time. He will also be debuting a new range of smaller, 2.5k bags, giving dog owners a choice between the standard 12kg food and a smaller quantity.

The Canine Cook produces 100% natural dog and puppy food with no artificial ingredients, colourings or additives. Using only the freshest ingredients, recipes include treats like prime Scottish salmon, Welsh lamb and English chicken and potatoes.

Having found that his own dogs became ill after years of eating commercial dog food, the innovative Canine Cook’s kitchen was borne. The team will be exhibiting at the Lincolnshire Steam and Vintage Rally at the Showground all weekend. With pets allowed to join the family fun and explore the steam engines, vintage tractors, cars and motorcycles, a visit to the Canine Cook stand is sure to be a welcome respite for the family dog. The Canine Cook will be offering samples of his Lamb and Brown Rice complete dog food,  Puppy +VERM X puppy food, salmon and potato hypo-allergenic dog food and tasty chicken treats throughout the weekend.

Mr Speed said, “We were delighted to discover that dogs are welcome at the Lincolnshire Show Ground and able to enjoy the weekend as much as other members of the family so it seemed fitting that we pick an event at the venue to mark our first ever exhibition. We’re very excited to get out of the kitchen and meet our customers and are looking forward to demonstrating how our natural dog food and hypo-allergenic dog food can help pets suffering from a poor diet to be happier and healthier.

“We’ll have lots of tasty samples on offer for humans and dogs alike so please do come along and say hello.”

The Canine Cook’s mission is to formulate delicious recipes that allow man’s best friend to live a long and healthy life. Quality rather than cost is the driving force, meaning the ingredients used are human grade, UK-sourced ingredients.

Find out more at http://www.dogfood.uk.net/

Also worth a look, dog food reviews. ]]> http://www.dognews.co.uk/hypoallergenic-dog-food-covered-in-new-book/feed/ 0 http://www.dognews.co.uk/warning-topless-surfers-set-to-make-a-splash/ http://www.dognews.co.uk/warning-topless-surfers-set-to-make-a-splash/#comments Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:55:16 +0000 admin http://www.dognews.co.uk/warning-topless-surfers-set-to-make-a-splash/ Read more »]]> "You can't get more Southern California than this." That's how a reporter in England described the annual, "Surf Dog Surf A Thon" benefiting Helen Woodward Animal Center (HWAC). "Families with their dogs at the beach… surfing! That's California." Now is the time to get a, "leg up" on the competition and register yourself (and your dog) for the 5th annual Surf Dog on Sunday, September 12 at world famous Dog Beach in Del Mar, California.

"Hundreds of dogs and thousands of people will, 'join paws' to help Helen Woodward Animal Center's Surf Dog Surf-A-Thon retain its title as the world's largest dog surfing event," says HWAC, "Big Kahuna" John Van Zante. "We allow 120 surfing dogs and we're expecting 150 human surfers and thousands of spectators. Surf Dog is huge!"

HWAC Sponsorship, "Wahini" Nedra Abramson says, "Returning surfers and sponsors including Iams dog food and GT Surfboards will be joined by new supporters that want to catch the wave of Surf Dog success. Proceeds support the programs and services that Helen Woodward Animal Center provides for animals and people in-need."

Surf Dog 2010 on September 12 will also feature, "Doo the Dah for the Dogs." Individuals and teams of up top 10 will surf while wearing costumes. Judges including champion surfers and members of the host surfing club, Swami's Surfing Association, will pick the top three individual or team costumes as well as the best themed team ride.

Activities for, "Sand Crabs" (non-surfers) will include the, "Beach Bum and Bikini Babe Canine Costume Contest." Dogs will strut their stuff on the, "catwalk" as celebrity judges including Shorty (as seen on Animal Planet's, "Pit Boss") and Animal Planet veterinarian Dr. Stacy Funchino pick the best costumes. The 2008 contest was featured on The Travel Channel's, "Bridget's Sexiest Beaches," resulting on Dog Beach in Del Mar being named one of the sexiest beaches in the world! (Yes, we see the irony in this. Girl dogs not wearing bikini tops? Sexy?)

Pat Weber and San Diego Surfing Academy will join world champion tandem surfer and board designer Guy Takayma and San Diego Pet Training owner Rob Kuty to oversee the event and assure safe surfing for all of the dogs and humans involved in the contests.

For more information visit Helen Woodward Animal Center at 6461 El Apajo Road in Rancho Santa Fe, CA, call 858-756-4117 x339, or log on to www.animalcenter.org

Worth a look: Find a pet friendly hotel anywhere in the world! ]]> http://www.dognews.co.uk/warning-topless-surfers-set-to-make-a-splash/feed/ 0 http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-attack-dog-bite-statistics-the-lies/ http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-attack-dog-bite-statistics-the-lies/#comments Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:43:19 +0000 admin http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-attack-dog-bite-statistics-the-lies/ Read more »]]> As we observe the fall out from yet another high profile dog attack here in the UK, we thought it would be timely to re-publish this article by Alison Green of DDAWatch, who poses the question on dog attack and dog bite statistics – 'Are we being lied to by politicians?'

Figures released to Norman Lamb of the Liberal democrats have been splashed all over the media alongside headlines proclaiming a rise in “dog attacks”. Pictures of snarling beasts, most often bull breeds or the current “devil dog” the Rottweiler have been used to help emphasise the point, writes Alison Green.

But wait one second…STOP THE PRESS… the figures do not show a rise in dog attacks. Allow me to explain.

A few years ago I did an awful thing.

I was at a barbeque on a lovely summers day with my family and our dogs. My children where playing with the other children and one of my dogs was playing with the resident boxer, the sun was shining and all was right with the world. My dog tired of his game with the boxer, picked up his ball before dropping it in my lap and sitting down looking at me hopefully. I smiled, picked up the ball and threw it for him.

The minute that ball left my hand I realised what I had done and yelled loudly to recall my dog but it was too late. As I yelled, my dog ran straight into my daughter knocking her flying down on the hard ground. Thankfully my daughter, although bruised and sore for a while, had no broken bones. My dog didn’t know what had happened but had stopped, ball forgotten and gone over to lick at my daughter.  I was mortified and have never taken a ball to another barbeque since!

Had my daughter been more badly hurt and been admitted to hospital, she would have been included in the recent figures paraded around the media as “dog attacks”.

What the media and Norman Lamb fail to mention in any article I have read, is that the figures do not separate dog bites from dog strikes.  I know of quite a few people who have been admitted to hospital because their dogs greeted them a little too enthusiastically or accidentally knocked into them.

They will all be logged under the same code meaning “bitten or struck by a dog” yet the two meanings are often very different and certainly don’t scream “dog attack”. Many people have been struck by dogs, many have been bitten by dogs however few have been attacked by dogs. While even one true dog attack is unacceptable the medias use of these figures to “show” an overwhelming increase in dog attacks is misleading and nothing more than scaremongering.

The media have also focused on the “rise” in certain areas but do not seem to be aware of the fact that the strategic health authority for treatment restructured at the start of 2006 which, according to Ben Bradshaw when he supplied the figures to Norman lamb as a written answer, means a direct comparison is not possible before and after 2006.

Hospital workers are also “ a bit bemused” by the figures.  It has recently been reported in one online newspaper that hospital bosses in west mids where surprised at the “findings” of an 80% increase in under 18’s being admitted due to “dog attacks”.

A spokesman for George eliot hospital in Nuneaton told a reporter for IC Coventry

Although we don’t have access to detailed statistics, we can say anecdotally that, if anything, the number of people needing treatment for dog bites is falling.

“We’re a bit bemused by these figures, to be honest. We don’t get anywhere near as many as we used to.”

The article goes on to state:

The same sentiment was also expressed by spokesmen for the University Hospital, Coventry, Warwick Hospital, and the Hospital of St Cross, in Rugby.

Maybe they are “bemused” because the figures are being stated as something they aren’t!

In recent years it has been pointed out that children 9 and under are more commonly admitted for “bites or strikes” from a dog and this is true. However over the last ten years in England, the number of children 9 and under who have been admitted to hospital for this reason, has actually risen the least of all age groups, by 4.1%. This equals just 39 more admissions when comparing 06-07 with 96-97. Using the same years comparison, the age group of 40-49 year olds show a massive increase of 136%. We rarely hear of large numbers of 40 odd year olds being attacked by dogs so would it be fair to assume we are actually looking at more strikes than bites?

Dog Attack Stats

It is not unusual for smaller children to be admitted to hospital more often than adults as a precaution. I completely agree with the reasons for doing so. Children are much more fragile and less able to tell you if there is a problem. If my children bang their heads I turn into the most paranoid mother about, constantly checking on them. Better to be safe than sorry so could this possibly explain the large number of young children being admitted? Children are also more likely to be knocked over by dogs simply walking or running past them.

There are many reasons that could contribute to any increase and could help explain why certain age groups are showing high numbers. The only thing the figures do not show is a definite increase in dog attacks.

The dog world does have problems and they are problems that need tackling. We, as dog owners, parents and members of the public, have all been let down time and time again by the law. The Dangerous Dogs Act was meant to protect us 16 years ago. It failed. Now the same people who helped bring in that law, are trying again!

Dog Bite Facts

The answer to our problems is simple. We need to look at facts and not create mass hysteria by telling only half of the story.  We need to log dog bites and strikes separately and in more detail. We need to know what the injury is, who, where and why. We need to ensure we all know how to act responsibly and safely around dogs.

We need a law that holds the owners responsible for their dog’s actions and ensure they are fully equipped to deal with the responsibility that comes with owning any dog BEFORE they obtain one.

Norman Lamb has got one thing right. He is quoted in several articles as saying

“No-one knowingly puts their child in danger but it seems that the message is not getting through.”

So lets make a Dog Ownership Test a legal requirement and force that message home.

More on dangerous dogs and breed specific legislation – DDA Watch.

Original article Dog Bite Statistics

Posh pets are being treated to their very own personal play space thanks to loft conversion specialists from South London.

As modern dog owners become increasingly interested in providing their four legged family members with an enriched environment, space conscious Londoners are turning to the attic space to create pet friendly living environments.

Loft conversions are particularly popular in areas where property square footage is at a premium.

But rather than denying themselves the opportunity to own large or medium sized dogs, South Londoners are making use of the unused space above their own living environments exclusively for the benefit of their dogs.

Dog friendly loft conversions are a growing trend amongst 20 to 35 year old, childless families who have disposable income, professional lifestyles and enjoy the company of well cared for dogs.

The growth in spending on pets by modern, city dwellers is set to rise over the coming decade.

New York City is said to have more dogs than people and, despite the obvious space issues, New York is routinely named as one of the most dog friendly places on earth.

Loft conversions may seem like a large investment as a means to keep a Labrador happy, but a recent study by Halifax Bank showed that a loft conversion can actually add signifcant, material resale value to a well situated property.

The Halifax study revealed that 50% of UK homeowners spent an average of £6000 improving their homes last year, with those choosing to convert their lofts spending more at just over £7000 each.

Many of these conversions include simple storage conversions, with actual spending on full conversions much higher.

Would YOU consider a loft conversion for your dog?
Does the rise in property improvements reflect modern dog ownership trends?
Is a loft conversion, custom made for a canine better than a kennel?

Keep up with pet industry trends and pet business news at Total Pet Business Magazine. ]]> http://www.dognews.co.uk/south-london-loft-conversions-gone-to-dogs/feed/ 0 http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-training-advice-never-too-late-to-train-your-dog/ http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-training-advice-never-too-late-to-train-your-dog/#comments Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:06:14 +0000 admin http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-training-advice-never-too-late-to-train-your-dog/ Read more »]]> It’s never too late to train your dog with “Smiles”

When Judi Robertson met Hampshire dog trainer Sarah Miles she was at her wits’
end as her 18-month-old cocker spaniel chased anything that moved and totally
ignored commands.

Like many untrained dogs, Gemma was frequently running off – responding to
her “hunting instincts” – and failed to take a blind bit of notice as Judi called in vain
for her to return.

Fearing the dog was a bit of a lost cause, Judi entrusted Gemma to Sarah – who
runs Dog Training with Smiles – and now describes her as a “super little dog”
who responded perfectly to the East Meon trainer’s tried-and-tested, professional
methods.

Judi said, “I love cocker spaniels and now have three of these busy little dogs and
it is essential that they are under control and respond to my commands, I consider
the training with Sarah to be very important and also ongoing. My dogs love her and
really enjoy their training sessions and I continue to learn a great deal. I am often
complimented on my dogs’ good behaviour and have frequently recommended
Sarah’s training to those in need of help with their pet or working dog

Judi’s three cocker spaniels are just an example of Sarah Miles’ many success
stories and her new workshops are going from strength to strength and are set to be
expanded.

Sarah works by observing each dog and then tackles any behaviour issues by
observing its nature and innate tendencies of the breed. She also helps owners to
carry on the good work and to understand their dogs’ needs. Her key message is that
happy owners, make happy dogs – KISS – Kind, Informative, Sensitive and Simple.

Sarah’s notched up particular success with older dogs – some of whom have been
dismissed by other trainers as being too old to train. The most common issues
include:

- Disobedience to the recall
- Lack of heeling both on and off the leash
– Over excitable behaviour
- Aggression
- General disobedience and failure to sit and stay.

Sarah said, “In an ideal world one would start training your puppy the moment it
comes home, however at this stage it is not called training it is conditioning. A simple
example of this is when feeding your puppy, stand in front of your pet with the bowl
of food and if the pup is standing just hold the bowl above the puppies' head and wait
until the puppy sits. Immediately this happens, then give the puppy the food. After a

while bring in the word sit, and by the time the puppy is ready for more formal training
you will have a dog sitting on command.

”However life is not always perfect so I get all types of dogs coming for training at
all ages – some people leave training too late, some accept behaviour patterns in a
young dog/puppy then the dog grows and the sweet little puppy that used to jump
up is now a large dog which is heavy and frightening when it jumps up. The longer
you leave the training of a dog and the inherent bad problems they pick up the more
difficult it is to resolve. The older the dog the bigger the footprint of the type of bad
behaviour.”

Sarah runs one-to-one training and classes from her Hampshire base. In addition,
once a month she holds a workshop based on "Understand your Dog", helping
owners to recognise and understand what their dog is communicating to them and
how you, as the owner can communicate with them.

She said, “Psychology of both people and animals plays a large part in the way that
I train and I observe the dog for some time to see what type of nature it has. With
animals the signs you are giving them can be very subtle – just the movement of
your hand can be enough to signal that you want them to do something.

“A lot of people treat a dog like a person and they are not – they are animals with
animal instincts and behaviour. However, they are very happy to be trained and
understood. They then become a well-behaved, loyal companion and friend for the
duration of their lives.”

For more details about Sarah’s training methods and classes, visit
www.smilesdogtraining.co.uk http://www.smilesdogtraining.co.uk or call
07768830937/01730823818

Related: Free dog training tips. ]]> http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-training-advice-never-too-late-to-train-your-dog/feed/ 0 http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-owners-urged-to-help-cattle/ http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-owners-urged-to-help-cattle/#comments Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:55:47 +0000 admin http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-owners-urged-to-help-cattle/ Read more »]]> Dog owners are being urged to clean up after their pets to help stop the spread of a virulent parasite in farms in the Yorkshire Dales National Park.

Vets and the Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority (YDNPA) have teamed up to highlight the dangers caused by neospora infection.

Neospora is a parasite found in dogs’ faeces and, if they foul grazing land and pregnant cattle ingest the parasite, it will cause them to abort or give birth to calves infected for life.

Alan Hulme, the YDNPA’s Ranger Services Manager, said: “We are urging all dog owners to make sure they clean up after their pets when they are walking in the National Park.

“Just one incident of a cow eating some of these eggs can have a huge impact on a whole herd – and a farmer’s future livelihood.”

Skipton vet Andy Barrett, from the Kingsway Veterinary Group, stressed that there was no danger to humans from eating meat from an infected cow or drinking its milk.

But he said: “Just one infected cow can have dire consequences on the profitability of a farm.

“If cattle are infected during pregnancy, the result can be abortion, birth of a weak calf or birth of a normal-looking calf that is infected for life. These calves then transmit the parasite across the placenta to all their offspring for the rest of their lives and these offspring are themselves up to seven times more likely to abort.”

 “Abortions are very costly and they deprive beef farmers of a calf from the affected cow and, in the case of dairy cows, lead to the loss of milk and a calf. An abortion in a dairy cow has been estimated to lead to a financial loss of £1,200.

“In addition, infected cattle can only be identified by expensive blood tests and there is no treatment for the infection.

“Once introduced into a herd, the parasite is spread very efficiently to calves and the involvement of dogs is no longer necessary.

“This year we have seen a significant rise in cases. In just two farms alone there have been 21 reported cases in the last six months – last year there were only four.

“There are no effective control measures against the parasite so it is essential that dogs are not allowed to foul farm land which could be grazed by cattle.

“We would ask all owners to clear up after their dogs wherever they foul – not just on footpaths.”

He said the parasite rarely caused disease in dogs and was very difficult to detect. ]]> http://www.dognews.co.uk/dog-owners-urged-to-help-cattle/feed/ 0